SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) In a significant legislative decision, California lawmakers have opted to block a proposed bill that sought to make oil and gas companies financially liable for damages incurred by homeowners as a result of natural disasters linked to climate change. The debate surrounding the bill heightened concerns about its potential impact on gas prices and job security within the energy sector.

The proposed legislation would have empowered victims of natural disasterssuch as devastating fires, catastrophic floods, and raging hurricanesto sue fossil fuel companies for damages amounting to a minimum of $10,000. Furthermore, home insurers would have gained the ability to pursue compensation under this legislation. The urgency for such measures was underscored by the tragic Los Angeles-area fires that erupted in January, which led to the loss of thousands of homes and claimed at least 30 lives.

On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee rejected the bill, with several Democrats abstaining from the vote. However, the committee did leave the door open for the potential reconsideration of the proposal later in the year. Opponents of the bill expressed concerns that it could adversely affect the energy industry, potentially leading to job losses and raising questions about the ability to pinpoint specific companies responsible for particular natural disasters.

State Senator Scott Wiener, a Democrat representing San Francisco and the author of the bill, strongly contested claims that the legislation would lead to elevated gas prices. Wiener emphasized that the focus of the proposal was to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for the ramifications of climate change. He argued that the legislation would alleviate some of the financial burdens faced by disaster survivors and insurance companies in covering damage costs.

Todays vote is a setback for the victims of the Los Angeles wildfires and for the cost of living in California, Wiener stated. Victims of the Eaton and Palisades Fireand all those affected by climate disastersdeserve accountability for the decades of misleading narratives propagated by Big Oil that have devastated their communities.

The underlying premise of the bill rests on the scientific consensus that the combustion of fossil fuelsincluding oil and gascontributes to the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, which in turn exacerbate global warming. This phenomenon has been linked to an increase in the frequency and severity of natural disasters.

State Senator Anna Caballero, a Democrat representing parts of California's Central Valley, argued prior to the vote that lawmakers' decision not to support the bill should not be interpreted as a lack of commitment to environmental policies. She expressed skepticism about the bill's efficacy in aiding individuals who lost their homes in the recent fires to rebuild their lives.

If this was going to actually result in building homes in the fire zones faster, better, and with more efficiency, I would probably support it, she remarked. But from my perspective, this is more about lawyers and litigation than about helping the victims.

Wiener stressed the importance of California maintaining its position as a leader in climate policy, particularly in light of actions taken by former President Donald Trump to roll back environmental regulations. Just recently, Trump issued an executive order aimed at identifying state regulations that he claimed could impede Americas energy dominance, specifically targeting Californias cap-and-trade program along with similar climate policies in New York and Vermont.

The failure of the California bill to advance comes on the heels of previous legislative attempts to hold oil companies accountable for health issues faced by individuals living in proximity to oil drilling sites.

California has long been recognized as a trendsetter in implementing climate policies, having approved numerous measures over the years to curb emissions from vehicles, lawn equipment, and various forms of transportation. Nonetheless, these initiatives have faced significant challenges, especially from the Trump administration, which prompted the California Air Resources Board to withdraw requests for federal approval to enforce stricter pollution controls on diesel-powered trucks and trains.

Moreover, other key regulations in California are now at risk, as Congressional Republicans have recently introduced proposals aimed at blocking state policies endorsed by the Biden administration. These proposals include measures to prohibit the sale of new gas-powered vehicles by 2035, reduce tailpipe emissions from medium and heavy-duty vehicles, and limit nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks, all crucial components in the fight against air pollution and climate change.

___

Austin is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow Austin on X: @sophieadanna