This article is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. To gain access to in-depth coverage and insightful stories, consider becoming an Insider today.

Recently, Katy Perry, the pop music sensation known for her chart-topping hits and vibrant persona, found herself in the crosshairs of criticism for her latest venture, which some say is emblematic of a growing disconnect between celebrities and everyday people. This scrutiny intensified after her journey aboard one of Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin rockets, a brief expedition that took her approximately 66 miles above Earth into the realm of commercial space tourism.

On Monday, Perry embarked on this highly-publicized journey that lasted about ten minutes, with a crew that included the renowned CBS News anchor Gayle King and Lauren Snchez, Bezos' fiance. They flew just past the Krmn linean imaginary boundary that marks the edge of Earth's atmospherebefore safely landing in Texas. This trip marks a significant moment in the burgeoning space tourism industry, where wealthy individuals can experience the thrill of spaceflight.

In the days leading up to the launch, social media buzzed with a mix of light-hearted humor and disdain regarding Perry's participation in what many viewed as a frivolous promotional mission. While some users shared memes poking fun at the brief duration of her flight, others expressed outrage, labeling it as a wasteful endeavor that served more as a self-indulgent publicity stunt than a meaningful contribution to society.

After her return to Earth, the critical commentary continued to flood in. One particularly pointed tweet noted, "Today Katy Perry burned more emissions than Taylor Swift did during the entire Eras Tour," emphasizing the stark contrast between Perry's space journey and Swift's impactful concert series, which contributed millions of dollars to local economies. The user concluded that Perry's venture seemed to offer nothing of value beyond a millionaire's whim.

Another critic highlighted the irony of Perry's environmental musings following her space flight, quipping, "Thinking 'we have to protect our mother' about the earth after going on a vanity space flight funded by a billionaire whose company is destroying said planet is just so funny." Such remarks underscore the growing tension surrounding celebrity culture and its perceived disconnection from pressing global issues.

The media quickly capitalized on the situation, with outlets like The Guardian publishing pieces questioning Perry's selection for the mission, asking, "So Katy Perry went to space. Wasn't there anyone else we could have sent?" Meanwhile, NPR compiled a list of "20 musicians who should get to go to space before Katy Perry," further amplifying the public discourse around her space endeavor.

Perry's pre-launch media tour, aimed at justifying the mission's significance, inadvertently provided more ammunition for her detractors. Speaking to the Associated Press, she invoked phrases like "feminine divine" a recurring theme in her latest album, "143." She also shared her personal excitement about the mission, recalling her recent engagement with Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" and string theory literature, expressing a lifelong fascination with astrophysics and the cosmos.

However, critics have raised an essential question: Exciting for whom? Perry's statements about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) have been met with ridicule on social media. Actress Olivia Munn was among those who openly criticized the Blue Origin mission as "gluttonous," adding a celebrity's perspective to the discourse surrounding this high-profile event.

While Blue Origin has not publicly disclosed the costs associated with its flights, reports suggest that the ticket price for each passenger could reach millions, with a hefty $150,000 deposit required to reserve a seat. The company's motto, "For the benefit of Earth," contrasts sharply with the criticisms that label such flights as extravagant ego trips for the ultra-wealthy. Many observers have pointed out the environmental impact of rocket launches and questioned the necessity of such missions, especially when celebrities like Perry are already under scrutiny for their private jet usage.

This escapade comes amid a challenging time for Perry, whose efforts to revive her music career faced setbacks last year. Her single titled "Woman's World," intended as a satire, was widely perceived as a misstep, leading to a significant backlash and what some termed a career crisis.

As the most recognizable figure on the Blue Origin crew, Perry naturally attracted attention, placing her at the center of discussions about space tourisma rapidly growing sector catering to affluent individuals. In interviews, she expressed her lifelong dream of traveling to space, stating, I was investigating all of the possible commercial options. Perry has also attempted to frame her journey as inspirational, particularly for young girls aspiring to follow in her footsteps.

Yet, many remain skeptical about the true value of a ten-minute joyride in a billionaire-funded rocket, especially as Americans grapple with everyday concerns like rising food prices, job stability, and student loan debt. Perry's comments about making science glamorous and bringing the ass back in astronaut have drawn a mixed response, with some calling it out as a tone-deaf approach in light of current societal challenges.

As the conversation unfolds, it is evident that Perry's space mission has sparked a broader dialogue about the role of celebrities in addressing pressing global issues and the responsibilities that come with their platforms. Whether she intended to bridge this gap or merely fulfill a personal aspiration, her journey has undoubtedly captivated public attentionproving once again that in the world of celebrity, the line between admiration and criticism can often be razor-thin.