This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now.

As Google faces significant legal challenges stemming from two major antitrust cases, the reaction from the marketing sector has been surprisingly muted. The tech giant is currently battling accusations that it has illegally monopolized both the search and advertising technology markets. While the outcomes of these cases could drastically alter the landscape of digital advertising, many marketers appear unfazed by the prospect of regulatory interventions that could lead to the breakup of Google's vast empire.

Google's parent company, Alphabet, is set to report its earnings this Thursday, a moment when executives may provide further insights to investors regarding the ongoing legal battles. The stakes are high; last year alone, marketers poured over $264 billion into advertising on Google platforms, including YouTube and its widely used search engine. Given such substantial investments, one might expect marketers to be anxious about the potential for Google to divest critical assets, such as its popular Chrome browser or essential components of its advertising technology stack.

However, the anticipated upheaval does not seem to be generating the excitement one might expect. The voices pushing for a Google breakup tend to come from competitorsnamely, those who operate demand-side platforms, supply-side platforms, and ad servers that challenge Google's adtech dominance. These organizations and the publishers who argue they have suffered due to Google's pricing practices are the ones most eager for change.

Interestingly, major brand Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) are largely silent on the matter, both publicly and privately. Despite the turmoil surrounding Google, CMOs express a preference for the current arrangements, largely due to the vast audiences Google attracts and the effectiveness of its advertising solutions. As Rob Norman, the former chief digital officer at the ad buying powerhouse GroupM, aptly summarized, "My feeling is advertisers enjoy a well-organized oligopoly Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, and a few others." In this context, the idea of a breakup may seem more theoretical than practical.

A marketer from a midsize company, speaking anonymously to protect business relations, remarked, "This is a drug people have become addicted to. Breakup or no breakup, people keep spending in these places because there's a lack of real alternatives that deliver." This sentiment underscores the challenges of finding viable substitutes for Google's offerings.

Nevertheless, there is a degree of optimism among marketers and consultants regarding the potential consequences of the antitrust cases. Some hope that the rulings could lead to increased transparency from Google regarding its data practices and allow for better integration with third-party tools. Moreover, there exists a belief that if Google loses some of its power, this might lead to more favorable conditions for negotiations surrounding significant advertising deals.

While these legal battles may have monumental implications for specific sectors within the advertising industry, CMOs are currently preoccupied with a host of pressing issues. These include economic downturns, increasing tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and significant cuts to advertising budgets. As such, the ramifications of a possible Google breakup are, for now, relegated to a lower priority on the marketing agenda. Steve Boehler, founder of the Mercer Island Group, aptly noted, "For enterprise CMOs, this is an issue to delegate."

In the midst of this uncertainty, Google has refrained from commenting on the ongoing cases.

Historically, industry insiders have been vocal about their desire for Google to enhance its transparency. Although major marketers may not immediately react to the outcomes of the current antitrust cases, there remains the potential for substantial shifts in search and online advertising.

To provide context, District Judge Amit Mehta is overseeing the Google search antitrust case, which recently reconvened to determine possible remedies following a ruling that found Google guilty of violating US antitrust laws. The implications could be significant, potentially forcing Google to divest Chrome, terminate exclusive partnerships with companies like Apple that position it as the default search engine, or even sever ties with its Android mobile operating system.

In addition, another judge announced that Google maintains an illegal monopoly in various adtech sectors, highlighting the company's ownership of an ad server, purchasing tools, and an ad exchange that connects publishers with advertisers. To illustrate, a Google manager likened the situation to "Goldman or Citibank owning the NYSE." A future hearing will help determine the course of action, which industry experts suspect may involve the forced sale of Google's publisher-side adtech operations.

Nonetheless, Google has announced plans to appeal the rulings, a move that could delay any remedies for years. Despite this caveat, there is a sense of satisfaction among some advertising professionals at the prospect of Google facing accountability following two consecutive antitrust losses. Dave Helmreich, CEO of adtech firm Triplelift, remarked, "Agencies, advertisers all understand that they are paying a premium for some lack of competitive advantage. There is a desire that I've heard from some people in the industry for Google to just get punished for something."

Beyond the immediate remedies, some industry experts are optimistic that the scrutiny surrounding Google, both domestically and internationally, may lead to more compliance with long-standing demands. Will Google finally allow advertisers to utilize their preferred adtech for purchasing ads on YouTube instead of mandating use of its own services? Could Google become more accommodating regarding third-party measurement tools for auditing ad campaigns? Gerry D'Angelo, a senior advisor at McKinsey and former vice president of global media at Procter & Gamble, noted, "Advertisers want interoperability to foster competition and independence to allow accountability."

Such developments could elevate standards across the advertising technology landscape, according to Arielle Garcia, a former agency executive now serving as COO of the nonprofit ad watchdog Check My Ads. She emphasized the impact of Google's dominance in establishing industry norms, stating, "Given Google's dominance in adtech, they have been able to establish the norms. Why would a smaller player invest in quality or policy enforcement in a way a larger player has not?"

As the cases progress, CMOs are also keeping a close eye on broader trends in consumer behavior, particularly as they reassess their marketing budgets in response to shifting market dynamics. Google CEO Sundar Pichai is steering the company through transformative changes, particularly with the rise of artificial intelligence technologies influencing consumer interactions.

Research from EMARKETER, a sister company of Business Insider, suggests that Google's share of the US search advertising market may dip below 50% by 2025, signaling a significant shift as competition intensifies from emerging platforms like OpenAI's ChatGPT, TikTok, and retail giants such as Amazon, Walmart, and eBay. Andrew Warner, a marketing consultant and former CMO for several notable brands, stated, "Google will be forced to compete harder and evolve one way or another, perhaps faster than it would have done anyway through the natural pace of change taking place in the market." He added, "That in itself is probably a plus for marketers and the consumers they serve."

For the time being, many marketers appear content with the status quo. Nikhil Lai, a senior analyst at Forrester, noted, "There is not a common feeling that advertisers want Google to become less powerful because, in exchange for Google's seeming omnipresence, advertisers get peerless signals for efficient and effective media planning, buying, and optimization."