The concept of a made-in-USA iPhone has lingered in the public consciousness for more than a decade, enduring numerous discussions and calls for action, particularly from political figures. Despite Apples consistent emphasis on the impracticalities of such an endeavor, the notion refuses to fade away. The latest report from the Financial Times delves into the complexities surrounding this issue, highlighting why the few components that are manufactured in the United States are not entirely American-made and detailing the extensive reasons behind the impracticality of the idea.

The idea gained considerable traction back in 2016, when then-presidential candidate Donald Trump urged Apple to relocate its production facilities to the United States. At that time, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology conducted an analysis, revealing that shifting iPhone assembly to the US would not significantly affect manufacturing costs. This is primarily because any U.S.-based production would likely rely heavily on automation, resulting in minimal job creation within the American labor market.

Since those early discussions, various experts have contributed their perspectives on why manufacturing iPhones in the U.S. is an unrealistic goal. Most recently, a former Apple manufacturing engineer reiterated these challenges, emphasizing the complexities involved in the current supply chain.

According to the Financial Times, a detailed examination of an iPhone reveals that it comprises an astonishing 2,700 components. Many of these parts are not individually recognizable; rather, what appears as a single component often consists of dozens of smaller elements working in concert. Overall, more than 700 different production sites are involved in manufacturing parts for an iPhone, with only 30 Apple suppliers operating entirely outside of China.

The geographical concentration of these suppliers in China presents the most significant obstacle to relocating production. Over many decades, China has meticulously developed intricate supply chains that facilitate the efficient production of high-tech devices like the iPhone. Recreating such a sophisticated network elsewhere in the world would not only be daunting but could take an equivalent amount of time.

While some components of the iPhone, like the display glass and Face ID lasers, are manufactured in the United States, this does not paint the full picture. For instance, although the touchscreen glass is produced domestically, the essential components that enable its functionality, such as the backlit display and the interactive layer, are largely sourced from South Korea and are assembled in China.

Moreover, moving production to the U.S. may lack political rationale. With the Trump administration placing pressure on Apple, any decision to shift manufacturing would be complicated by the current political climate. Experts, including Andy Tsay, a professor of information systems at Santa Clara University, argue that it is impractical for companies to cater to a presidency that could change in less than four years. The American system as it stands, where everything can completely flip-flop every four years, is not conducive to business investment. When people and companies make investments, they need to have a longer horizon than that, he stated, emphasizing the need for stability in business decisions.

The Financial Times report offers a deep dive into the implications and challenges of producing an iPhone in the United States, providing a comprehensive understanding of why this aspiration remains more of a fantasy than a feasible reality.

Highlighted accessories