This story is accessible exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Consider becoming an Insider to gain full access to our insightful articles.

In a significant unfolding of events, emails from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, some dating back over a decade, have come to light, showcasing his early concerns regarding antitrust issues long before the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated its legal case against the tech giant. During a rigorous ten-hour testimony, a lawyer representing the FTC probed Zuckerberg about these revealing communications, which have raised eyebrows and fueled further scrutiny of Meta's business practices.

Among the key pieces of correspondence is a 2018 email where Zuckerberg candidly expressed apprehensions about the company's trajectory. While we believe our current trajectory will yield strong business growth over the next 5 years, I worry it will also undermine our global network, erode our corporate brand, impose an increasingly large strategy tax on all of our work, and then over time we may face antitrust regulation requiring us to spin out other apps anyway, he wrote to top executives at Facebook.

The FTCs lead attorney, Daniel Matheson, emphasized the importance of another part of Zuckerberg's message that painted a picture of potential future consequences for Meta. While most companies resist breakups, the corporate history is that most companies actually perform better after they've been split up, Zuckerberg noted in the same email. When pressed by Matheson to elaborate on the corporate history he referred to, Zuckerberg appeared momentarily stumped, admitting, Im not sure exactly what I had in mind then.

The trial, which commenced on a high-profile note this past Monday, is anticipated to stretch out for approximately eight weeks. Mark Zuckerberg, along with Sheryl Sandberg, was called as the first witness for the prosecution, setting a dramatic tone for the proceedings ahead. The courtroom drama intensified as Matheson pointed to a 2012 instant message Zuckerberg sent to Sandberg, where he bluntly articulated the necessity of acquiring Instagram. In a tone that oscillated between business strategy and casual banter, he even offered to teach her how to play Settlers of Catan. Messenger isn't beating WhatsApp, Zuckerberg wrote, highlighting the urgent need for Facebook to acquire Instagram, which was outpacing their growth. Instagram was growing so much faster than us that we had to buy them for $1 billion. Groups and Places, although smaller efforts, have made only a little progress. That's not exactly killing it.

Interestingly, Facebook's acquisition of WhatsApp followed about two years later, amounting to a staggering $19 billion. Should the FTC prevail in this case, they could potentially force Meta to divest Instagram and WhatsApp. However, legal experts assert that the government faces a challenging task in proving that Meta solidified its monopoly through these acquisitions, particularly since the FTC had previously approved those mergers.

In October 2012, Facebook officially rebranded itself as Meta, marking a significant shift in its corporate identity.

In the courtroom, a sketch artist captured Zuckerberg's expressions while he faced intense questioning from the FTC lawyer. The narrative surrounding Zuckerbergs concerns has been met with mixed reactions, as Meta has aimed to downplay the implications of his past messages. Mark Hansen, Meta's lead attorney, suggested that worrying comes with the territory of being a tech CEO. He asked Zuckerberg, Was it a constant joke at Meta that you were worrying and the sky was falling? To this, Zuckerberg humorously remarked that if it is indeed a joke, it probably occurs behind my back, but acknowledged that worry is an integral part of the Silicon Valley climate.

Despite the plethora of examples where Zuckerberg expressed concerns over Instagram and WhatsApp's ascent, Hansen pointed out that there were also instances of apprehension regarding other now-defunct social networks, like Path. In a 2012 email, Zuckerberg voiced his apprehensions about Path, stating, I'm getting a bit more worried about Path, highlighting its potential threat to their core operations around identity and friend sharing.

However, the real substance of Zuckerberg's worries seems to be rooted in his concerns for Instagram and WhatsApp. The FTC argues that Facebook's acquisitions were motivated by fears that these platforms could evolve to more closely resemble Facebook. If Instagram continues to kick ass on mobile or if Google buys them, then over the next few years they could easily add pieces of their service that copy what we're doing now, Zuckerberg stated in another email from 2011, emphasizing the significant competitive threat they posed.

When it comes to WhatsApp, the FTC presented an array of messages highlighting Zuckerberg's unease regarding the messaging app's rapid rise in popularity, particularly beyond U.S. borders. In one email, Zuckerberg described his meeting with WhatsApp co-founder Jan Koum, expressing admiration for Koum but also disappointment at his apparent lack of ambition, which he described as fairly impressive although disappointingly (or maybe positive for us) unambitious. This characterization paints a revealing picture of Zuckerbergs mindset as he navigated the competitive landscape at the time.

In stark contrast to his assessment of Koum, the FTC also shared messages where Zuckerberg expressed frustration with Facebook's struggle to develop a camera app that could compete with Instagrams growing dominance. What is going on with our photos team? Zuckerberg asked in a 2011 message that was partially redacted during the court presentation. He articulated a sense of urgency about addressing leadership issues within the team to rectify what he perceived as a critical situation.