A draft executive order currently under consideration by the White House suggests a significant restructuring of the State Department, with profound implications for its operations, particularly in Africa. According to a document obtained by The New York Times, the proposed reorganization could lead to the elimination of nearly all operations in Africa and the closure of numerous embassies and consulates across the continent.

This draft not only targets the African operations but also advocates for cuts to various offices within the State Department headquarters. Specifically, it aims to dismantle divisions that focus on pressing global issues such as climate change, refugee advocacy, as well as the promotion of democracy and human rights. These moves suggest a shift away from a comprehensive foreign policy that has been a hallmark of U.S. diplomacy.

The motivation behind this executive order, which is expected to be signed by President Trump within the week, is described as a push for a disciplined reorganization of the State Department. Officials involved in the discussions highlight the need to streamline mission delivery while simultaneously addressing issues of waste, fraud, and abuse within the department. The proposed changes are expected to be implemented by October 1, adding a sense of urgency to the process.

In conjunction with these operational changes, the executive order would initiate a series of layoffs affecting both career diplomatsknown as foreign service officersand civil service employees who primarily work at the departments headquarters in Washington, D.C. Current and former U.S. officials who are familiar with the plans revealed that the department is prepared to place a significant number of employees on paid leave and issue termination notices to many others. This potential downsizing raises serious concerns about the future of U.S. diplomatic efforts globally, especially in regions that may rely heavily on American support and engagement.

The implications of such cuts could be far-reaching, particularly for diplomatic relations in Africa, where U.S. embassies play a vital role in fostering partnerships, trade, and humanitarian aid. Critics of the proposed order are likely to voice concerns about the long-term effects on American foreign policy and its ability to respond to international crises.