Sign up for the Surge, a newsletter that distills the most significant political happenings of the week, delivered straight to your inbox every Saturday. This engaging newsletter has captured the attention of many, including the Easter Bunny and its opposite, the devil.

As expected, we have reached a pivotal moment where former President Trump is poised to impact the Federal Reserve, a situation that has House Republican moderates voicing their concerns against proposed Medicaid cuts. Meanwhile, Harvard University finds itself navigating a precarious relationship with the federal government, raising questions about its independence.

Lets delve into the key highlights from this weeks political landscape.

1. Chris Van Hollen: The Unlikely Star of the Week

Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen, known for his low-profile, dedicated approach to governance, turned heads this week as he embarked on a significant journey to El Salvador. His mission? To visit the notorious prison where the Trump administration had mistakenly transferred Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Initially, guards informed Van Hollen that he could not enter due to orders barring his visit. However, persistence paid off, and he ultimately met Abrego Garcia at a hotel.

Upon returning to the U.S., Van Hollen's visit sparked a heated debate, particularly among Republicans who seized the opportunity to portray Democrats as more concerned about undocumented immigrants than American citizens. Some Democrats echoed these sentiments, fearing the potential backlash. However, with midterm elections still 19 months away, there is ample time for strategic recalibration among the party's ranks.

While there are risks associated with excessively glorifying Abrego Garcia, the core issue remainsthe administration's actions in illegally transporting someone to a foreign prison, contradicting a court order. Legal pathways for deportation exist, yet they remain unexplored, raising serious questions about the administration's adherence to the law and court rulings. Arguing against such actions may not only be justified but could also resonate negatively with the public.

2. Jerome Powell and Federal Reserve Independence

The topic of Federal Reserve independence is once again in the spotlight. The potential for the loss of this independencewhere the chairman and board of governors are influenced by political motives rather than economic dataposes a significant risk to the stability of the American financial system. This concern was amplified this week following remarks from Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, who was originally appointed by Trump. Powell commented on the precarious balance of inflation and sluggish growth currently threatening the economy, which understandably irked Trump.

In a social media outburst, Trump reiterated his belief that Powell should be lowering interest rates and lamented that his termination cannot come fast enough! This raises an essential question: can a sitting president indeed dismiss the head of the Federal Reserve simply for not aligning monetary policy with his demands? This issue is still under judicial review, but the implications are profound. Living in a country where the president can dictate monetary policy based on personal interest is a chilling prospect.

3. House Republican Moderates and Medicaid Cuts

This Monday, a dozen House Republican moderates representing competitive districts expressed their disapproval regarding potential reductions in Medicaid coverage. They sent a clear warning to their party leaders: we cannot and will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations. However, skepticism abounds regarding their resolve, given their historical tendency to cave under pressure.

The moderates have found themselves in a tricky situation, especially after voting for a reconciliation framework that includes substantial Medicaid cuts. Their letter emphasized protecting access for the nations most vulnerable populations, but notably sidestepped the broader implications for the 20 million individuals covered by Obamacares Medicaid expansion.

Discussions are underway about potentially eliminating the generous federal funding arrangement that covers 90% of Medicaid expansion costs. Such a move could lead many states to withdraw from the expansion altogether, a development worth monitoring as plans unfold.

4. Harvard University Under Pressure

In a surprising turn of events, Harvard University found itself at odds with the federal government after receiving a threatening letter outlining demands for hiring, curriculum, and faculty changes to maintain its federal funding. This tactic mirrors previous efforts against institutions like Columbia University and left-leaning law firms. However, Harvard stood firm, declaring that it would not compromise its independence or constitutional rights.

This response ignited a firestorm, with Trump retaliating by calling for the IRS to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. The IRS has indeed launched an investigation into the matter, while the Department of Homeland Security threatened to block enrollment for international students unless Harvard complies with additional demands. Regardless of ones stance on Harvard, this situation exemplifies the ongoing struggle for institutional independence amid governmental pressures.

5. Grover Norquist and Tax Policy Shifts

In an unprecedented twist, conversations are emerging among Congress and the White House about potentially raising the top marginal income tax rate in the upcoming reconciliation bill. This shift would challenge long-standing Republican economic principles and could serve as a counter to the Democratic narrative that the GOP prioritizes tax cuts for the wealthy while slashing Medicaid. However, actual implementation will hinge on Trump's willingness to champion this change, as congressional leaders seem disinterested in pursuing it.

If such a tax increase were to materialize, it could signify the decline of yet another cornerstone of Reagan-era RepublicanismGrover Norquist's pledge against tax increases, which has historically instilled fear in lawmakers. In the current landscape, however, the fear of defying Trump appears to overshadow any concerns about violating Norquists pledge.

6. David Hoggs Bold Move

David Hogg, a prominent activist and survivor of the 2018 Parkland school shooting, has become a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee. While this role may seem ceremonial, Hogg is also spearheading an initiative called Leaders We Deserve, which plans to invest $20 million in primary challenges against established incumbent Democrats in favor of younger candidates. Hogg acknowledges this strategy will likely provoke backlash and anticipates a smear campaign aimed at undermining his credibility.

This bold move raises critical questions about the dynamics within the party. Hogg's dual role as a party leader and primary challenger to incumbents creates inherent conflicts. If he believes that older Democrats need to be replaced, he should fully embrace that mission rather than straddling responsibilities that clash.

7. Lisa Murkowski: A Reflection on Fear

During a recent interaction with nonprofit leaders in Alaska, Senator Lisa Murkowski made a poignant statement about fear in today's political climate. She confessed, We are all afraid, highlighting the anxiety many lawmakers feel about speaking out against the prevailing administration, particularly Trump. This candidness was interpreted in various wayssome construed it as a sign of weakness, while others recognized it as a reflection of the intense pressures faced by lawmakers representing states reliant on federal funding.

Murkowski's sentiment captures the broader tension within Congress, where the fear of political repercussions influences decision-making. As the country grapples with these uncertainties, the importance of open dialogue and courageous leadership remains paramount.

So, as we navigate this tumultuous political landscape, it's essential to remain engaged and aware. The weather looks promising this weekend, so perhaps its a good time for reflection and discussion.